Answer:
North Carolina residents want the government to fix existing roads first, before building new ones. They also favor improving rail services and buses to increase the number of public transportation users. But some citizens complain that governments are robbing Peter to pay Paul, shortchanging one area that needs transportation funds in order to contribute to another area.
Explanation:
Only use the important part
I think it should replace the “.” after slogan. Hopefully that is the answer?
Can you explain your question more ?
<em>The answer is A.</em>
<em>The sentence states it as though the character was "oblivious" to an audience, suggesting that he/she was not aware of the audience.</em>
<em>The definition of Oblivious is:</em>
<em>"not aware of or not concerned about what is happening around one."</em>
<em>That means that the character was not aware of the audience, meaning that the answer would be A.) Unaware of.</em>
<em>Hope this helps.</em>
<em>-Northstar</em>
I say talk about economic policy. Argue for a position you believe in (be it Socialism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism, or whatever). I would start by using a anecdote that described the issue using the negative consequences of embracing the other perspective, immediately tarnishing the person's first impression of the opposite ideology. Then, I would involve logos by saying things like "just think about it, and you'll realize it makes perfect sense" and explaining my position as though it were a formula. Ethos would come into the picture when I mention the opinions of professionals and scholars who I've hand=picked to agree with me on the topic. Pathos has already been used in the form of the beginning anecdote, a "sob story" so to speak.
Hope that I helped!
