One important distinguishing feature of valid arguments is that the conclusion is always based on the premises or follow the premises. If the premise is true then the conclusion is true. If the premise is is false, then the conclusion is false. They are valid arguments.
It’s not a stand-alone program
Answer;
-A foreign company that wants to have their shares traded on U.S. stock exchanges who uses accounting practices that comply with IFRS
Explanation;
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the primary accounting standard-setting body in the United States. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) is a set of accounting standards that have substantial authoritative support and which guide accounting professionals.
-FASB goal is to provide leadership for public companies in establishing and improving the accounting methods used to prepare financial statements. The FASB has the authority to set, but not enforce, accounting standards. Enforcement falls under the jurisdiction of the SEC. The FASB takes recommendations from the SEC and the AIPA when devising or improving standards; however, it is not required to.
The correct answer is Only (A) and (C) are true
Explanation:
In a study or research, the control group is the one that does not receive a treatment. This means, in this case, the control group includes those who only drink the green tea without the herbs because they serve as a standard to measure the effects of the herbs. This makes statement A (The "only green tea" group serves as the control group) true; also, the group receiving the herbs is the experimental group.
On the other hand, a double-blind study is one in which the researchers and the participants ignore who is receiving the treatment, which guarantees there is objectivity. This occurs in the study presented because neither the researcher nor the subjects known who received the herbal mix. Thus, statement C (This study is double-blind) is true.
Finally, a study is classified as observational if there is not intervention but the researchers just observe participants to study a phenomenon. This does not occur in the study presented because there is an intervention through the herbal treatment, and therefore the study is not observational.
