1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harlamova29_29 [7]
3 years ago
12

Which statement describes a difference between the legislative procedures

History
1 answer:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
5 0

The statement which describes a difference between the legislative procedures  of the House of Representatives and the Senate is ''The filibuster can be used in the Senate but not in the House''

Answer: Option D

<u>Explanation:</u>

The filibuster in the United States can only be used by the senates and it cannot be used by the house of representatives. Filibuster is a method that is used by the senate of the house where the one or more than one senators can make attempt to delay a vote or block a vote on a particular bill which has been passed in the house by extending debate on that particular topic. This tactic is also only present and this power is only present with the senates and not with the house of representatives.

You might be interested in
The city of Oak Ridge,Tennessee contributed to the World War II effort by
Dmitrij [34]
Being part of a research development site for the atomic bomb :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which characteristics of government did the U.S. Constitution codify in 1787? Select all that apply.
fomenos

Answer:

  • election of representatives to a lawmaking body
  • equality of citizens under the law
  • a system of checks
  • balances among branches of government

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States set up America's national government and major laws and ensured certain essential rights for its residents. It was marked on September 17, 1787, by representatives to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Under America's first administering record, the Articles of Confederation, the national government was frail and states worked like autonomous nations. At the 1787 show, delegates formulated an arrangement for a more grounded government with three branches—official, administrative and legal—alongside an arrangement of balanced governance to guarantee no single branch would have an excessive amount of power.

9 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts
Radda [10]

Answer:

The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

Explanation:

Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called <em>"Wal-lam-wat-kain," </em>a Native American tribe.

Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the <em>Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.</em>

The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that <u>the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty,</u> while <u>Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.</u>

For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was the site of Potomac River chose for the capital
snow_tiger [21]
Abundance of water was why, i might be wrong so dont quote me
3 0
3 years ago
The President can veto any laws that Congress makes, but Congress can override the veto with a 2/3 vote or the judicial branch c
Mrrafil [7]
Answer is: checks and balances.
Checks and balances were principles of separation of powers (shared powers) the founders added a system. Checks and balances enable that each branch of government (executive, legislative, <span>judicial</span>) exercises some control over the others branches.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What important change did the roman emperor constantine make in 330<br> a.d.?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the greek idea of democracy
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the klu klux klan important to American history
    12·1 answer
  • What conditions must be met regarding presidential appointments
    10·1 answer
  • Please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In one paragraph, summarize the important achievements and contributions of ancient Greek and Hell
    12·2 answers
  • 3. In Southwest Asia ______ are the largest ethnic group. A. Kurds B. Arabs C. Persians D. Turks​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did President Wilson proclaim that this war would be “the war to end all wars?
    15·2 answers
  • PLZZZZZ HELPPP<br><br> 2. What are the three amendments from 1865 – 1870 called?
    9·1 answer
  • What important geographical features lead to the development of Mesopotamia? Pls write three complete sentences.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these describes a responsibility of the federal reserve
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!