Answer:
They both aim at reducing the barriers which exist between the two organizations and this is with the aim of promoting trade
Explanation:
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
During the Gilded Ages, social problems arose such as the dominated discussions with regards to the different classes such as better, dangerous and respectable classes, which arose during the development of the US into an Industrial economy. Another Social Problem was that the described overworked individuals in the Fall River was described by the owners as sc#m of the English and Irish men.
Answer:
indicating that something is confined to the specified subject or recipient.
"we agreed to set up such a test for him alone"
