Answer:
.a. True
Explanation:
<em>The theorists thought about the legitimate question on the potential recipents of organs contributing most to the good of the society is a good and true.</em>
<em>Imagine a situation where by someone that was jailed for robbery for 15years having 5 months to complete his or her sentence. The person was diagonised with kidney failure and needed kidney transplant which was successfully done</em>. It is a logical thing that, he or she should be of ggod behaviour when he comes out from the presion rather than going back to his old ways, committing more violent crimes and on an alchol drinking spree.
This actions of that person would definitely negates the aim of the donor of the organ when made aware that the recipent is far more a nusiance to the society than he was before the transplant was carried out.
Ruth’s death would be an example of what Shneidman refers to
as sub intentional death. This occurs when there is an indirect or
unintentional action or behavior that the person committed that would likely cause
an indirectly cause of death to occur which is seen in the scenario above.
The events that are most likely to be considered a normative age-graded influence on development are marriage and retirement
<h3>What is a normative age-graded influence on development?</h3>
This refers to the various things that cause changes in the lifestyle of a person and can be biological or environmental.
Hence, we can see that when a person gets married, he undergoes a normative age-graded change as his lifestyle and habits change, the same thing happens when someone retires.
Read more about normative age-graded influence here:
brainly.com/question/20738533
#SPJ11
The answer is <span>Acquiescence. This</span> is a group of response prejudice in
which defendants to a survey have an inclination to agree with all the
questions or to show a positive connotation. So in the question,
when Elmer told Lilah was a spoiled brat, Lilah thought was true so in that
case she agreed with Elmer. This response also referred to as
"yea-saying" and is the inclination of a respondent to approve with a
statement when undecided.
The writer that Woolf refers to that used a male pen name in order to hide her identity was Currer Bell - APEX
