The answer is <u>"Collecting, reviewing, and analyzing data to identify safety trends".</u>
The motivation behind the Army Safety Program is to shield and protect Army assets around the world, to incorporate Soldiers, Army regular folks, and Army property against coincidental misfortune. It accommodates open wellbeing occurrence to Army tasks and exercises. From the leader to the Soldier and non military personnel worker, mischance avoidance is everybody's obligation.
There are various advantages when risks are distinguished and controlled. For instance:
Damage counteractive action – ensure our staff
Administration change – a unit that has a proactive, compelling security program has pioneers that search for the issues previously they move toward becoming mischances.
Mission security – ability and status
Harm control – anticipate inadvertent loss of hardware
and many more...
Hope it helps!
Negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement
Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
I believe the answer is external stakeholders
