Answer:
Explanation:
Historians since the late 20th century have debated how women shared in the French Revolution and what long-term impact it had on French women. Women had no political rights in pre-Revolutionary France; they were considered "passive" citizens, forced to rely on men to determine what was best for them. That changed dramatically in theory as there seemingly were great advances in feminism. Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. The women demanded equality to men and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination. Their chief vehicle for agitation were pamphlets and women's clubs, especially the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women. However, the Jacobin (radical) element in power abolished all the women's clubs in October 1793 and arrested their leaders. The movement was crushed. Devance explains the decision in terms of the emphasis on masculinity in wartime, Marie Antoinette's bad reputation for feminine interference in state affairs, and traditional male supremacy.[1] A decade later the Napoleonic Code confirmed and perpetuated women's second-class status.[2]
The largest sector of Israel's economy involves "<span>high-tech industries," since the relatively small size of Israel limits its production of other things such as petroleum and coffee. </span>
The reason why the Framers of the Constitution wanted the selection of justices to be non-democratic is because they didn't wanted these justices to be "swayed" by public opinion, which could allow them to make judicial decisions based on what would most likely get them re-elected, as opposed to what was in the best interest of the country.
Answer:
It became dominated by foreign interests. It changed from a democracy to a dictatorship. It changed from a dictatorship to a democracy. It became dominated by a single political party
Explanation:
<span>Military leaders A) regulated political parties and B) controlled elections. They had complete power within politics to sway the elections the way they wanted, and since they had military force, it was difficult to defy them. However, they did not kidnap or kill dissenters, nor did they arrest legislators. The power they displayed was much more diplomatic and strategic than it was physical.</span>
