1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delvig [45]
3 years ago
13

What was a negative impact of Europeans occupying the African continent?

History
2 answers:
podryga [215]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

There were many negative impacts due to European colonization of Africa.  Since the other user stated disease & slavery, I will only briefly talk about those (abuse is very much in the realms of slavery).

During the Colonial Era as well as the Age of Imperialism (which followed after), Europeans (specifically France, Spain, Britain, and later on Germany, Austrio-Hungary, etc.) were keen on exploring, creating colonies, and exploiting the resources offered by these 3rd world countries (of the time).

Africa, on one hand, took the brunt force of most of these colonies, as they suffered the longest colonization period. Towards the beginning of the colonization era, Africa was explored as Europeans had to go around the Cape Horn in an effort to find a oceanic route to China, where they hoped to open trade with. This led to European countries laying claim on African lands where they land, and building up colonies there. However, the Europeans soon had a falling apart with the tribes, which led to wars between the colonizers and the colonised. Usually, the Europeans were victorious (except for cases such as Ethiopia & Italy, but even then, they fail later on), and imprisoned many of the natives, leading to a large supply of slaves within the Middle East. As the states in the US soon expanded and grew into a country, many southern states soon had a growing market for these said states, which led to the enslavement of many fit Africans. (negative impact #1: enslavement of Africans).

On top of enslavement, the European countries soon introduced "cash crops" to the nations, which were crops (tobacco, cotton, and the like) that generated "cash", but not food, which the colonies dutifully grew, which delayed their economic growth, as they were not able to self-sustain, and their economy relied heavily on one or two crops (which can have a changing market demand; Remember the supply v. demand, in which prices vary depending on demand. If the demand is low, the price would generally be low). These crops were perfect for certain time periods, but soon fell out of favor, resulting in loss profits. These countries, with their only high-source of income being these cash-crops, soon lost profit, which resulted in a smaller economy than before.

Another negative impact that the Europeans had have in occupying the African Continent, was the amount of funding they gave to the nation. Excluding stronger economic nations in Africa (Egypt really), and the Middle East, most of the nations were not properly funded, and lacked development. This is extremely true, as most 3rd world countries are located in Africa and the Middle East. The way most power was given back to the people during the decolonization era also led to wars and coup d'tat across the continent, leading to an unstable economy and life for those who lived in it. Without proper decolonization methods, the countries soon fell into turmoil.

Finally, the African culture was heavily damaged due to European colonization. As most Europeans during that time were either Roman-Catholic or Protestant, the colonizers also brought their religions with them, and usually forced natives into believing in their same religion. While this is not a bad thing in itself, it led to a destruction of their native religion as well as their culture, and the way they lived.

All of these are different kinds of ways Europeans have a negative impact on their former African countries.

~

olga55 [171]3 years ago
4 0

Disease, slavery and abuse of the African people

You might be interested in
Which of the following countries were the axis powers
harkovskaia [24]

Central powers: (WW1)

Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey

Axis Powers: (WW2)

Germany, Italy, and Japan

My teach told me as well put the central powers just in case.

Sorry if I am wrong.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many people participate in this at 11
Furkat [3]
Your answer is C) A poppy toss, then right after that a moment of silence! 
•❋Korey❋•

6 0
2 years ago
How did the Japanese government react when the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima?
Damm [24]

Japan's Reaction Despite the horror of Hiroshima, there were many in the Japanese government that disbelieved the United States had the technical ability to develop, yet alone transport and drop, an atomic bomb. The events of August 9 changed all that.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements describe important characteristics of the growth of monarchies in Europe during the late Middle Ages?
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

A. Some rulers raised armies to conquer larger territories and defend their borders.

B. Rulers made laws for their subjects and set up courts to keep the laws.

D. Conquering rulers seized land from nobles and gave it to those who would swear allegiance to them as king.

7 0
2 years ago
1. Why was Robert E. Lee convinced that he should attack in the Northern territory again in June of 1863?
Pachacha [2.7K]
1. Lee believed that he needed a victory in Northern soil in order for the Confederacy to survive.
2. On July 1, 1863, the Confederate won a tactical victory causing the Federal troops to take position on Cemetery Hill and Cemetery Ridge, just south of Gettysburg.
3. Confederate troops were already in Gettysburg trying to determine the strength of the Union presence in the town. By mid-morning, while the Northern troops were fighting off the Confederate infantry, more Union reinforcements arrived so Lee decided to commit fully to the battle.
4. General Lee lost the battle at Gettysburg.
5. The Union troops held strong positions from Cemetery Hill to Culp's Hill.
6. Lee believed that they had won the previous day's battle.
7. Picket's division lost 2/3 of its men and they were driven back by the Union forces.
8. False.
9. Lee lost a third of his army with around 23,000 casualties.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What book brought the publics attention to damage caused by pollution in the early 1960's?
    9·2 answers
  • What gains of land did the spanish conquer in 1763?
    8·1 answer
  • Pls helppppppp asaplpp
    5·1 answer
  • What was the trail of tears?
    12·1 answer
  • In House I, Lichtenstein plays with _____.
    5·2 answers
  • Which outcome did the battle of san Antonio de Bexar have
    15·1 answer
  • 1859 deed scott john brown
    14·2 answers
  • What are some things Lewis & Clark and the Corps of Discovery might run into during their 8,000 mile expedition?
    5·1 answer
  • A well-known Frenchman, who supported the American cause, ___________ helped trained the American forces during the winter at Va
    11·1 answer
  • What were specific limits placed upon the government by the English Bill of Rights?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!