I believe the answer is: whether the Supreme Court could hear the case.
At that time, President Nixon wanted to use his Executive previlege to avoid the supreme court from hearing his case and argued that it's all for the sake of national security. The court ruled against nixon and ordered him to hand over the tape which lead to his impeachment during the watergate scandal.
Answer:
1. Yes
Explanation: British were bad to the Colonists, the British took over the homes of the colonists. And the British wanted to fight and take over the country they found.
D) He sent representatives for negotiation, but they were met by French officers known as x, y, and z who required a bribe before they would listen to negotiations. They also required that the U.S. pay off all debt as well as give them a loan. This caused French hatred in the U.S. and was known as the XYZ Affair.
Trusted them more then the other bank
<span>The way separation of power guards against tyranny is that separation of powers separate the powers so nobody has more power than the next person, but tyranny is just one individual or a group of people with all power. One way the federalism guards against tyranny is that federalism shares power, unlike tyranny which is one individual or a group of people are controlling everything. How does the Constitution guard against tyranny? How did the framers of the Constitution guard against tyranny? The way framers of the Constitution guarded against tyranny is that the framers of the Constitution have separated powers and none has power over another unlike tyranny, it has no separated powers it has only one person or a group with all of the power. The way this small state - large state compromise guards against.</span>