False.
Book reviews review the book as a whole, including style, theme, how interesting it was, etc.
Answer:
the part when he chased down the duck
Explanation:
Answer:
A. The burden of things
F. The value of things
J. The call for things
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
<em>Type A,B, or C for blank 1</em>
The burden of things
The loss of things
The beauty of things
<em>Type E, F, or G for Blank 2.</em>
The demand of things
The value of things
The absence of things
<em>Type H, I, or J for Blank 3.</em>
The need for things
The passion for things
The call for things
This question refers to the essay "The Tyranny of Things" by Elizabeth Morris. In this essay, Morris argues that possessing and desiring things can be a burden on people. She refers to this burden as a "tyranny," due to the fact that such a need can end up controlling and affecting your whole life. Morris also talks about the value of things, as she urges us to only acquire those things that truly bring value to us. Finally, she discusses the call for things, as well as the urge that people often have to own more than they need, even if this causes them more problems than benefits.
<span>a. If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament.
</span>What argument does the author anticipate and refute in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence? "Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our<span>British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity."
</span>
NOT:
<span>b. Most British Parliament members sympathize with the plight of the American colonies.
c. The American colonies are well represented in the British Parliament and have no right to blame the king.
d. The allegations against the king made by the colonists are without proof and unjustified.</span><span>
</span>
The words that best describe how the author ironically portrays Mr. Symmes in this line are, "heathenish" and acting in a sort of "Christianized" manner. The word heathen describes a person who does not belong in any religious group. In short, he is called a pagan. But in this line, it was mentioned that Mr. Symmes was acting like a Christian, which makes this line ironic.
