Answer:
This is a question that requires an answer from your heard but I'd say they ended up getting along.
Explanation:
The fight was short, right?
There is no other explanation.
"And the Echos jump, and tinkle, and swell.
Answer:
By comparing Macbeth and Banquo to predatory animals like eagles and the lion, the Sergeant clearly conveys the idea that these two men were aggressive and strong in battle.
Explanation:
William Shakespeare's Macbeth excerpt shown in the question above shows how the author decided to use figurative language to describe strong men, warriors who were a cause of fear for those who dared to turn their enemies. For this reason, Shakespeare chose to compare them to predators, the eagle and the lion, which are imposing, strong animals, aggressive with their prey and who exhibit an air of superiority related to their strength, leadership and grandeur.
Answer:
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which that reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend many months or years researching and preparing a report. Investigative journalism is a primary source of information.
Explanation:
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend months or years researching and preparing a report. Practitioners sometimes use the terms "watchdog reporting" or "accountability reporting".
Most investigative journalism has traditionally been conducted by newspapers, wire services, and freelance journalists. With the decline in income through advertising, many traditional news services have struggled to fund investigative journalism, which is time-consuming and therefore expensive. Journalistic investigations are increasingly carried out by news organisations working together, even internationally (as in the case of the Panama Papers and Paradise Papers), or by organisations such as ProPublica, which have not operated previously as news publishers and which rely on the support of the public and benefactors to fund their work.
The growth of media conglomerates in the U.S. since the 1980s has been accompanied by massive cuts in the budgets for investigative journalism. A 2002 study concluded "that investigative journalism has all but disappeared from the nation's commercial airwaves".[1] The empirical evidence for this is consistent with the conflicts of interest between the revenue sources for the media conglomerates and the mythology of an unbiased, dispassionate media: advertisers have reduced their spending with media that reported too many unfavorable details. The major media conglomerates have found ways to retain their audience without the risks of offending advertisers inherent in investigative journalism.
