Answer is in the photo. I can't attach it here, but I uploaded it to a file hosting. link below! Good Luck!
tinyurl.com/wpazsebu
Answer: Continental Congress
Explanation:
The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777, but the states did not ratify them until March 1, 1781. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. Once peace removed the rationale of wartime necessity the weaknesses of the 1777 Articles of Confederation became increasingly apparent. Divisions among the states and even local rebellions threatened to destroy the fruits of the Revolution. Nationalists, led by James Madison, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Wilson, almost immediately began working toward strengthening the federal government. They turned a series of regional commercial conferences into a national constitutional convention at Philadelphia in 1787.
Financial status impacts marital stability in many different ways. If a married couple struggles with financial worries there would be be blaming, worrying and shame in the family that can lead to many arguments. The husband or the wife may feel they are not doing enough to provide and to protect their families and may feel anxious as a result. If the main concern of a family is its financial survival, many other necessities may get neglected because of lack of money. The couple may feel tense and the tension may even contribute to the break up of the marriage.
Other factors associated with a couple's financial status are: health, education, recreational activities. The better the couple's financial status, the more healthier the family is, the better the education they can afford for their children and the better the cultural and social activities they can participate in.
Answer:
That statement is False.
Explanation::
Social inequality tend to occurs when a certain group of people are not given with the same opportunities with other group of people to achieve positive things in their life (this can be things such as economic benefit , societal treatment, etc)
When we create a division based on individual characteristics, abilities, and behaviors, some group of people are naturally will be considered as 'the better ones'.
For example, color of the skins can be considered as individual characteristics. Separating people with different colors often lead to open discrimination that lead to a situation where people with a certain color are less likely to be hired, more likely to be prosecuted, etc.
This will make the 'worse ones' have smaller chance to achieve success in their live and lead to the social inequality.
I think your question if if they can "co-exist", correct?
They can and they have coexisted many times in the past, and even today. A monarchy with teocracy happens when there is a ruler (monarch ) who has an absolute or near-absolute power and claims to derive this power from God.
A historical example is ancient Egypt and a current example is Vatican City
