Answer: A. The inability of a plant asset to meet its demands.
Explanation:
When something is said to be inadequate, it means that it is not in enough quantity or rather lacks the capacity to perform the tasks that it is needed for.
The same goes when this is being spoken in relation to an asset. A plant asset that is inadequate is unable to meet the demands that it was acquired for.
Answer:
competition
Explanation:
In simple words, competition refers to the tendency of two or more parties to perform better than one another for the sake of own personal benefits. In business, competition can be done from various perspectives like price or quality.
In the given case, Jeff has been producing at a lower cost but despite of earning high profits he is willing to sell for lower prices with the motive of competing in the market and gaining higher market share.
Answer: Soldiering.
Explanation:
In response to the speculation that some workers would be laid off, the employees have resorted to Soldiering as a form of protest. Soldiering involves employees doing work within given period of time.
Answer:
1. per se application
U.S. Competition Law
This law checks whether certain parts of a contract or agreement have violated US antitrust laws.
2. Misuse of activity
EU Competition Law
This is part of the European Union's competition law that prohibits the use of activity to try to gain unfair advantges.
3. Extraterritoriality
US and EU
This is a provision in both US and EU anti-competition and anti-trust laws that states that the activities of foreign companies fall under the law if these activities influence the people within the jurisdiction of the US or the EU.
4. Trade obstacle, nontariff
France
These are a part of the French system.
5. Strict liability
U.S. Tort Law
A concept in US Tort law that states that a person is liable for an offence they committed and their state of mind or intent when they committed said offence is irrelevant.
6. Punitive damages
U.S. Product Liability Law
A concept in the US that allows for the extra punishment of the party in the wrong to dissuade others from doing so and to reward the party in the right more justly.
a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible features; a compromise.
"a trade-off between objectivity and relevance"
