<span>Hamlet, Act III Scene I - here are some ideas and two videos to start the comparison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO-wxlavDQI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7EH0FxJVCs
It could be seen that these videos are recorded in different times and by different actors. As regards the 1st one, both are well- known today and it seems that it was done many years ago. the 2nd might show a modern version in a theater not in a setting and with a poorer production.
As in the 1st one the actors are dressed according to the time and props are used to represent Shakespearean years the 2nd presents no props, no scenario just actors without even wearing customs.
</span>
The second version might show actors standing and sitting while the 1st one that are always standing.
The 1st video seems to have lost colour maybe because of the pass of time and the 2nd presents bright colours. As regards the camera shots in the 1st video, it could be seen some close-ups and distance shootings while in the second the camera is pretty near the actors.
The answer would be C. flavors :)
Answer:
Mairs responded by telling them that their depiction was painful to the disabled people, especially when it comes to their<u> self-esteem</u>. This makes the disabled people hopeless in conforming to the society that they belong–thinking that they'll never be good enough when compared to the able-bodied in the advertisements. This makes them <u>invisible to the society.</u>
Explanation:
The local advertiser she asked responded to her that they didn't include disabled people in their advertisements because<u><em> people might get a wrong notion that the advertisement was only for the disabled people.</em></u>
For Mairs, it is important that the able-bodied people should also recognize the disabled people as an important part of the society.
They can not support the main detail