1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadusha1986 [10]
3 years ago
7

Can some one help Me Out here

History
1 answer:
Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
7 0
The answer to your question would be letter C.
You might be interested in
Hurry
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

to indicate that Ali was a leader even though he did not actively choose to be one .

Explanation:

Ali was a large influence to everyone, mostly because first of all he was a sportsman, but also refused to participate in Vietnam War. Although he didn't choose to be a political leader, his influence was even larger than the influence of certain politicians in the States.

5 0
3 years ago
What are some problems face by west africa
aleksandrvk [35]
Dehydration and starvation
3 0
3 years ago
Name 3 way the ww1 had became a global war
Olin [163]
Three ways WW1 went from being a localized European conflict to a global one: 

<span>The declaration of war by Britain in 1914 brought the Commonwealth into the war involving far-away countries like Canada and Australia and India. </span>

<span>One method used by the Germans to defeat Britain was sea blockade; by the German High Seas Fleet at the beginning of the war then with submarines later... this was counters by the British Home Fleet based at Scapa Flow. By trying to cut off goods being sent to Britain the war was fought at sea also in the Channel and in the Atlantic. </span>

<span>Neutral countries like the USA joining later in the war in 1917 make WW1 an even bigger global conflict. </span>

<span>A forth way is how the British, French and Germans all had colonies in Africa - and fought each other there also. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Was the Industrial Revolution a "fair" excuse for IMPERIALISM?
natali 33 [55]

With regards to whether imperialism was a fair excuse for the Industrial Revolution, the answer is that <u>it was not. </u>

<u />

<h3>What was the relationship between imperialism and the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
  • Raw materials were needed to produce more goods and so colonies were acquired to get these goods cheaply.
  • New markets were needed to sell the goods produced as well.

Both of these are not good enough excuses for imperialism because these nations could have engaged in fair and mutually beneficial trade that would have led to both the colonized nations, and themselves, developing.

Find out more on imperialism at brainly.com/question/353575.

6 0
3 years ago
Industrialization in the early 19th century led to all of the following EXCEPT 1) specialization. 2) greater self-sufficiency. 3
liberstina [14]
Out of the choices given, industrialization in the early 19th century led to all of the following except for specialization. The correct answer is 1. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The United States and the Soviet Union became the two superpowers following World War II. What did they do to go about defending
    11·1 answer
  • Wilson urged congress to delacre war on germany because it
    6·1 answer
  • What issues encouraged membership in the communist party?​
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement about the Virginia Plan is accurate?
    6·2 answers
  • 9. Most of the farming in Southern Europe takes place on plains along the
    9·1 answer
  • After World War Hollywood studios were responsible for the majority of the great film . True False
    14·1 answer
  • What effect do you believe Franklin D. Roosevelt was intending with his speech?
    6·1 answer
  • The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Marbury v.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the largest piece of compromise in the Great Compromise?
    8·1 answer
  • What is federalism?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!