Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The numbers 0 and 1 are neither prime nor composite. They are too special because they represent nothingness (zero) and wholeness (one), so the idea of having factors for 0 and 1 does not make sense. ... For example, all even numbers are divisible by two, and so all even numbers greater than two are composite numbers.if a natural number is not prime, then we say that it is composite. ... Example: The value six, 6, is a composite number because it has four counting number factors: 1, 2, 3, and 6. We have 1 · 6 = 6 and 2 · 3 = 6. It turns out that mathematicians have declared that 1 is neither prime nor composite.
Answer:
Dilation of 3
Step-by-step explanation:
7/100 = 0.07
0.07 * 12.5 = 0.88
20/100 = 0.2
0.2 * 12.5 = 2.5
2.5 + 0.88 = 3.38
3.38 + 12.50 = 15.88
You spend a total of $15.88.
Answer:
Wyatt wrote the correct expression
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we are to evaluate which of the students wrote an expression with the highest common factor being 8c
For Tanya; 32c + 16c; 16c( 2 + 1); This is wrong as the highest common factor is 16c
For Wyatt, we have 8c - 48cd; factorizing, we have 8c(1-6cd); This is correct
For Xavier we have 36c-24c; 8 is not a factor of 36, so it won’t work
For Yang 8c + 40; 8(c+ 5); what we are trying to look for is 8c and not 8 so this is wrong also
Where is the rest of the question
