<u>The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</u> is a mystery about the two friends Hyde and doctor Jekyll written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and mystery drama investigated by the lawyer Utterson.
The line shows the conflict between the character vs. self.
<h3>The mystery novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The conflict is the obstruction of characters by other characters in success or development. In this excerpt, the conflict is between the lawyer and his perception about the other character Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer Utterson is a friend of doctor Jekyll and dislikes another character dear to the doctor named Mr Hyde.
- Siding with his conflict the lawyer agrees with the doctor to comply with his request and accepts the proposal with a sigh.
Therefore, it is character vs. self option c.
Learn more about The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
Answer:
mark me brainlist if i helped
Explanation:
Rikki-tikki's decision to destroy Nagaina's eggs contributes to the story by driving the action forward towards the main conflict and ensuring that there will be no more cobras in the garden, at least in the immediate future. The destruction of the eggs leads to the final conflict between Rikki-tikki and Nagaina.
I believe the correct answer is: Using technical language
helps the author stress the complexity of the scientific advances and
technological achievements that Edison observed.
In this excerpt from “"Edison Marvels at the Magic of
Electricity" from the New York Tribune (October 19, 1922), author intentionally
incorporate such highly technical language to stress the complexity of the
scientific advances and technological achievements that Edison observed.
Answer:
C: choices that are impossible to reverse
Explanation:
