I would say the theme is literary. The kid who doesn't study gets a bad grade while the one who did is the first one finished. But it isn't stated explicitly (as a direct or stated theme would be). I hope this helps.
The need for qualified workers did not hamper the organization of work, as shown in the last answer option.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Labor organizations were looking for improvements in the labor sector, which guaranteed labor rights, better wages, and more security.
- However, many people saw this as a way of harming entrepreneurs and tried to fight these organizations.
- Thus, to harm organizations, laws were passed against organizations, accusations of disloyalty to America, and a strong fear that this would increase the price of manufacturing products and that this would increase the price paid by consumers.
However, the need for skilled workers did not harm labor organizations, on the contrary, this need promoted other organizations and ensured safer and more specific work.
Learn more about labor unions:
brainly.com/question/17833295?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
A.
Stream of consciousness is a method of narration that describes happenings in the flow of thoughts in the minds of the characters.
Answer:
a. Fausto knows that the dog was not really in danger, but the husband and wife believe he rescued their dog.
Explanation:
"The No-Guitar Blues" tells the story of Fausto, a Hispanic boy who dreams of becoming a famous guitarist, however, his family does not have the money for him to buy a guitar and take classes to learn how to play it. However, he finds a lost dog, which belongs to a wealthy couple who are offering a reward to anyone who finds the dog. Faust returns the dog and receives the reward, but the couple asks how the dog was found. Faust did not find the dog in any danger, but he tells an entirely different story to the dog's owners who begin to think that the animal was in great danger while it was lost.
This question is missing the options. I've found them online. They are the following:
Why does Lincoln conclude with an appeal to both pathos and ethos? Check all that apply.
to emphasize citizens’ responsibilities
to stir listeners’ emotions
to cite important legal documents
to offer hope for the future
to recommend a military surrender
Answer:
Lincoln concludes with an appeal to both pathos and ethos to:
to emphasize citizens’ responsibilities
to stir listeners’ emotion
to offer hope for the future
Explanation:
<u>As we know, pathos is an appeal to emotion, while ethos is an appeal to ethics. Both are rhetorical devices used by speakers to convince their audiences of an idea. In this case, Lincoln's purpose was to appeal to people's sense of duty as well as their empathy</u>. He wants his audience to remember they still have <u>responsibilities</u> ahead of them, important ones. <u>They are to care for the families of fallen soldiers, and they must also keep on fighting to make sure those soldiers' deaths were not in vain. </u>He also wants him audience to remain <u>hopeful </u>about the future, evoking the <u>image of a lasting peace, which is the most desired thing in times of war.</u>
