Answer:
3. The Supreme Court redefined what constitutes a handgun under the Second Amendment
Explanation:
When the Supreme Court enforced the decision in all states that individuals have the right to own a firearm at home for self-defense, the Supreme Court redefined what constitutes a weapon under the Second Amendment.
This is because it is the second amendment that establishes the citizen's directory and duty to provide their own security through firearms. In other words, according to any citizen amendment, regardless of gender or color, being of legal age and being psychologically healthy, you can have a firearm that guarantees your personal safety whenever necessary.
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
