1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
6

How did the Soviet policy of perestroika contribute to the breakup of

History
2 answers:
NikAS [45]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is most likely B.) because the inflation rates sky rocketed
Ganezh [65]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer is : D. It demonstrated that the Soviet Union was no longer

committed to supporting communism.

Explanation:

Perestroika (restructuring) was a late attempt by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to democratize and reform the Soviet communist system. The economy was stagnated , there were serious macroeconomic problems and it had become technologically backward in comparison with the West. Central controls were relaxed and decision-making was decentralized, enterprises were encouraged to get financial autonomy, land could be leased for family farming. Private initiative was encouraged. Perestroika did not bring the results expected. It was too late. Communism collapsed in the USSR.

You might be interested in
How to use precedent and cabinet in a sentence
vodka [1.7K]
He is a part of Trump's cabinet members. 

He wanted to free slaves on the precedent that all men are created equal. 
3 0
3 years ago
By paying low wages, factory owners were able to increase their profits in a
Helga [31]
A. seems the most likely because rest are absurd. Increase in profits = less money to spend which = more money to spend on ads or add more goods to make at the factory

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt and answer the question.
Dima020 [189]
When new people come into town, there are bound to be those filled with curiosity to see who this new person is. There will be people who will want to accommodate the new person and guide them to places. But this does not mean that the new people who have come to our town can be rude and unmannerly. We have as much curiosity as you and when you come into our town we hope that we can be able to accommodate you and have opportunities to meet up. But because some people who come into our town forget about good manners and show great rudeness we cannot guide you , we cannot observe you even if we wish to. That is why we have to hide behind bushes where you are going to pass. And we are to never intrude ourselves into your company because we do not wish to be met with rudeness.

The idea I think Franklin is conveying in this excerpt is that when you go into a new place into someone else’s town. Do not forget your manners and do not be rude because if those in the town are met with your rudeness they may not want to accommodate you anymore.
5 0
3 years ago
What consideration must be addressed when deciding for whom to produce
ohaa [14]
<span>A society (or country) might decide to produce candy or cars, computers or combat boots. The goods might be produced by unskilled workers in privately owned factories or by technical experts in government-funded laboratories. Once they are made, the goods might be given out for free to the poor or sold at high prices that only the rich can afford. The possibilities are endless.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
What was the relationship between Greek and roman culture ?
Elenna [48]
While both Greek and Romans were pretty ethnocentric by modern standards, the Romans assimilated far more people into their institutional lives.

Many non-Greeks adopted Gteek lifestyles, language and habits after the age of Alexander, but the cross-pollination was more frequently cultural than political. Cleopatra might have dressed like an Egyptian queen and patronized the Egyptian gods, but she wouldn't have had Egyptian generals or Egyptian judges. The Greeks tended to settle into the cultures they occupied like the British in India: remaining separate from and believing themselves superior to the people around them, even while encouraging the 'natives' to adopt their culture habits.

Romans did a much more thorough job assimilating the peoples they conquered. Non-Romans could and did become citizens, even from very early times. This started with neighboring groups like the Latins, but eventually extend to the rest of Italy and later to the whole empire. Eventually there would be "Roman" emperors of Syrian, British, Spanish, Gallic, Balkan, and North African descent Farther down the social scale the mixing was much more complete (enough to irritate many Roman traditionalists). This wasn’t just a practical accommodation, either — when emperor Claudius allowed Gauls into the Roman Senate he pointed out that by his time the Romans had been assimilating former enemies since the days of Aeneas.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When the name of a nation that is part of an acide ends in ite the acide name include the suffix?
    11·1 answer
  • Plz help it worth all my grade and also it’s multi choice
    12·2 answers
  • The geopolitical setting of which countries can be explained by its membership in the warsaw pact during the cold war and its lo
    13·1 answer
  • All of the following people were valuable helpers to Paul in Ephesus and Corinth except for
    6·2 answers
  • How did the English Bill of Rights affect the powers of government?
    10·1 answer
  • YESSSS THE GUY WAS FOUND GUIlty in georges floyds death YES YES YESSSSSSSS
    7·1 answer
  • Who is this wrong answers only​
    7·2 answers
  • Name the 5 cities where the general assembly have met in georgia
    12·1 answer
  • What if Hitler won WW2
    9·2 answers
  • In ONE paragraph with no sentence count or limit, explain the difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's philosophies on
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!