Answer:
The answer is B) "lower the prices that customers pay."
Explanation:
Actually, to increase capacity during high demands, the company do not need to lower the prices that customers pay but rather in crease the prices. According to law of demand and supply, the higher the demand, the more the price. Also, the company may also open another new branch for more production, approve overtime work and wages for employers, create more shifts and even subcontract part of the production to another company to ensure faster process but with same quality.
Answer:
Freight-absorption
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the Texas Granite Company in Dallas should use Freight-absorption pricing in this situation. This is a pricing strategy in which the seller takes responsibility for all the freight charges that the company incurs in order to attract the amount of business that they hope to achieve. Since company's that are looking to buy see 0 freight charges it becomes a deal since they are saving money as opposed to buying from another company that charges the freight charges to the buyer.
Answer: The correct answer is "d. equal to average cost, including the opportunity cost of capital.".
Explanation: In the long run the prices charged by a firm in monopolistic competition will be equal to average cost, including the opportunity cost of capital.
In long-term monopolistic competition, the demand curve will be tangent to the average long-term cost and the price set at this level. The benefits will be equal to zero and therefore there will be no entry or exit of companies.
Answer: a. an express warranty
Explanation:
An EXPRESS WARRANTY refers to spoken or written promises or guarantees made by the seller about the performance of a product when negotiating with a buyer.
For example, "this product is guaranteed against wear and tear for at least 2 years".
Roy Mustang in this scenario made an explicit promise about the effectiveness of the Stallion and as such that constitutes an EXPRESS warranty.
It is worthy of note that for Express Warranties, the word Warranty does not even need to be included for the promise to be a warranty.
Answer:
The correct option is E,Ted's annuity has a higher present value than Allison's
Explanation:
Both annuities do not have equal amount today as $1000 received today is higher in value terms than $1000 receivable in a month's time since cash receivable earlier is much more valued than the one receivable later.
Ted's annuity is an annuity due not an ordinary annuity
Allison's annuity is an ordinary annuity not annuity due
Allison's annuity has a lower present value than Ted's and not the other way round.
The only correct statement is option E,since Ted is expected to receive $1000 today, his annuity has a higher present value compared to Allison's
