The looking-glass self is a social psychological concept introduced by Charles Horton Cooley in 1902 (McIntyre 2006). The concept of the looking-glass self describes the development of one's self and of one's identity through one's interpersonal interactions within the context of society.
Presidents typically depend on their fellow partisans to get their policy proposals enacted in congress.
A partisan is a devoted soldier or member of a political party. The phrase describes those who fervently adhere to the policies of their party and are unwilling to reach a political compromise. A political partisan should not be confused with a partisan in the armed forces. Over the past 60 years, the meaning of the phrase has undergone a significant alteration in the United States. Prior to the American National Election Study, which began in 1952 and is discussed in Angus Campbell et albook .'s The American Voter, it was common practice to infer someone's partisan preferences from their voting record. Since that time, the term "partisan" has evolved to describe a person who has a psychological affinity for one of the two main parties.
Learn more about partisans here:
brainly.com/question/21902069
#SPJ4
He will most likely exhibit a decrease in self-confidence during adolescence. The two most normal self-confidence drops amid adolescence are toward the start, in Early Adolescence when isolating from adolescence, and toward the end, in Trial Independence when leaving home to work more all alone terms. In both cases, the youngster must get used to working on a fundamentally extended playing field of life experience than she or he experienced some time recently.
Answer: Tiit -for -tat strategy
Explanation:
Tiit -for -tat was introduced by Anatol Rapoport. He developed a strategy in which each participant in follows a course of action consistent with his opponent's previous turn. In other words, the opponents previuous moves are mimicked.This is an action is of mutual benefit. This strategy is an example of reciprocal altruism and cooperation.
If a human brain is not flexible, it will be a lot more limited than it already is. In another way of looking at it, you can even say that if it does not expand, it is only a box or a storage. Our brains do not only work as storage of information! We also use our brains for thinking etc. If it is rigid, when a lad hit you accidentally on the face with a paper, you may resort to violent retaliation.
Brains should be adaptable on the grounds that on the off chance that they weren't we could never have the capacity to expand our astuteness. Individuals are more adaptable mentally on the grounds that we can turn our hands to more mind boggling things and can learn better.
