Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
No because no one has told him that or even showed signs of thinking that way
There are many factors that could hamper an effective communication. Some of those could be: social status (if you are talking to someone who has a more important status than yourself, it may happen that they are not interested in a communication with you), use of language (if you use inappropriate words, the conversation is not going to be successful), knowledge about the subject (if you don't know what you are talking about, the conversation is likely not going to continue), atmosphere/noise, cultural differences, disabilities, etc.
You could read Chapter Nineteen for the answer
Answer:
The answer all depends on your current living conditions and the amount of money you posses. IF you had a steady and secure job that paid a lot and you had a good house with constant food source then yes. IF you have a job that doesn't pay a lot then obviously no. Working only one or two days today would be hard, and I speak from a bit of experience as my parents work 6 jobs and we still struggle sometimes. So the answer is it depends on the type of job you have.
