The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the regions and descriptions to be matched. Where is the information or concepts we have to match?
Although you forgot to attach this important information, we did some deep research in order to help you.
In the mid-1800s different regions had different needs and interests. These are the matches.
Had a focus on industry, including manufacturing and trade - the North.
Had an economy that was based on cash crops grown on plantations - the South.
Had a desire for affordable land and improved transportation - the West.
We are talking about the post-American Civil War years, where there were notorious regions in the United States that lived in different economic and social situations.
The correct answer is D.
<u>An advocate of economic sanctions would consider them as a sort of punishment </u>imposed on a country, and a succesful manner to change their behaviour.
Economic sanctions are financial and commercial penalties established against a country or group of countries. These can consist on the establishment of trade barriers or tariffs. Another common approach is to set an embargo on a certain country, which consists on the partial or total ban on trade with a particular state.
Answer:
Explanation:
First, know that the Electoral College was not made to be a 'perfect' system. And in today's times, the Electoral College has been considered 'out of date'.
One advantage of the electoral college is that it promotes fairness from a regional perspective.
Individual votes count, but in a way that is represented by states.
This prevents 2-3 very large states from overwhelming the popular vote count so that a greater portion of the country can be represented by the government.
The disadvantage is that individual votes feel like they do not count either. In 2000 and 2016, the candidate who won the popular vote did not win the electoral college.
Therefore in my opinion your answer should be A: Prevent a single region of the country from having too much political power.
Hope this helps you understand a bit more.
The most widely accepted theory on how early humans migrated to North America is the one that raises that the first settlers of North America crossed from Siberia through the Bering Strait.
For 19,000 years there was the possibility that the primitive tribes of Asia could cross the Beringia bridge. The first one to compose a possible migratory model of Asians to America through Beringia was Caleb Vance Haynes in an article published in the journal Science in 1964.
The most important data to establish a migratory theory during the last glaciation is the fact that Canada was completely covered with ice during the last glaciation, invaded by two gigantic plates: the laurentine ice plate and the ice plate of the mountain range. This made it impossible to enter the continent beyond Beringia.
A theory was then developed: shortly before the end of the last glaciation and the Beringia bridge was flooded, the edges in contact of the two large ice sheets covering Canada began to melt, opening an ice-free corridor of about 25 km wide, which followed, first the valley of the Yukon River and then the eastern edge of the Rocky Mountains along the Mackenzie River corridor. Scientists who hold the theory estimate that this occurred in 14,000 BC, although others question the date and claim that it could not have happened until 11,000 BC. At that time the human beings who were in Beringia could move towards the interior of America although there is still no physical evidence to prove the fact itself.
This theory was articulated with the discoveries of the Clovis culture that dated from the year 13,500 BC to conclude that it had been integrated by the first migrants that entered by the bridge of Beringia, which in turn would have descended all the other cultures indoamericanas.
The answers are c and d and b might be right
Hope this helps!
