OK I know that #11 is the cell wall and #10 is the mitocondria that's all I know sorry
Answer:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options are:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
b)Solicitation with promise of reward.
c) Appropriate.
d) Generalized
e) Positional authority.
In psychology, coercion is the act of forcing another person to act in a way that the person doesn't want to by using force or threats. This threats can include punishment if the person doesn't act the way the other person is asking to.
In this example Mathew promises to fire her if she doesn't engage in sexual activity with him. T<u>his "promise" is more like a threat and the consequence of not complying with it would be the punishment of getting fired</u>. Therefore, the right answer would be that this type of sexual harassment is a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Correct answer: robbery.
Explanation: there are different kind of crimes, felonies and offenses. Robbery is the one that involves taking or the attempt to take somebody´s property by force or by putting the victim in fear. It´s a violent crime, it has a violent nature inherited (different from shop-lifting or burglary).
The characterization of the three types is the following:
- Professional intensive offenders: have robbery as a lifestyle, they commit numerous offenses.
- Amateur intermittent offenders: they choose their victims randomly, mostly vulnerable ones (women, elderlies) with known profit potencials.
- Specific-objective offenders: they commit robbery to support a drug adiction or their gambling habits.
The correct answer is reverse double standard.
Double standards is described as <span>the </span>software of different sets<span> of </span>principles<span> for </span>comparable situations<span>. </span>it's far maximum typically seen<span> as a decisive </span>psychological tool<span> used to </span>protect<span> one’s ego or </span>unconscious<span> from the shortcomings </span>of 1<span>’s </span>very own<span> set of values or contrasting principals. </span>it's miles<span> the employment of a hypocritical and biased </span>standpoint<span>, with which </span>to separate<span> the </span>reputedly terrible<span> in others from the </span>bad<span> in oneself </span>by using<span> having </span>two sets<span> of </span>guidelines<span> for the </span>same idea<span>.</span>
