Answer:
correct option is a. money
Explanation:
solution
we know that Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese automotive manufacturer company
so they material resource are paint and steel and tire and factory etc
but not money because money is a financial resource not a material resource
and all resource is depend on money
so here correct option is a. money
Answer:
4.0
Explanation:
Degree of operating leverage = Contribution Margin / Income
Degree of operating leverage = 4000,000/1000,000
Degree of operating leverage = 4 times
If the sales are Increased by the X% then the income will be increased by the 4.0*X%.
Answer:
a. The Geometric average return is 1.72%
b. The Arithmetic average return is 1.75%
c. The Dollar weighted average return is 2.61%
Explanation:
a) In order to calculate the time-weighted geometric average return we would have to calculate first the Holding period return as follows:
Holding period return = (200 - 190) / 190 = 5.263%
Hence, Geometric average return = (1 + .05263)^(1/3) - 1 = 1.72%
b) To calculate time-weighted arithmetic average return we have to make the following calculation:
Arithmetic average return = 5.263% / 3 = 1.75%
c) To calculate time-weighted arithmetic average return we would have to make the following calculation:
Dollar weighted average return=-190*3 + 200/(1+r) + 200/(1+r)^2 + 200 / (1+r)^3 = 0
= 2.61%
Answer:
Rewards for inefficiency
Explanation:
Rewards for inefficiency refers to simply rewarding an employee or group of employees for not doing their work properly. In this case, the team that was working on project XK11 is inefficient and they are simply lazy or bad at what they do, and instead of taking actions to correct this bad behavior, management rewards them by giving them more time = less work.
The problem with this scenario, is that the team that is currently working on project YK12 will eventually realize that they are being punished for being efficient and working properly. They will soon start being inefficient and lazy as the other team in order to be rewarded.
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
