Answer:
None.
Explanation:
The text looks well punctuated and capitalized. There is no grammar mistakes either.
The correct alternative is letter B. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, in 1954, was a very well known case judged by the Supreme Court of the United States which has decided to be unconstitutional all racial segregation in public schools in the United States. This decision has overturned a previous decision of 1986, in the Plessy v. Ferguson which had validated racial segregation in public areas in the US, such as schools, hospitals and bus and train stations.
The sentence that best integrates information from two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows ..."
<h3>How to integrate two or more sources?</h3>
In writing, integrating sources implies using different reliable sources to support an idea or better explain an issue. If sources present contradictory information, the best is to:
- Briefly state the idea each source supports to show the contradiction between sources.
- Mention the type of source in each case (book, article, blog, etc.).
<h3>What is the best option?</h3>
The best option to integrate the two sources is "While one article claims that climate change does not affect sea levels, another article shows examples of U.S. states..."
The main reasons are:
- This mentions the type of sources (articles).
- This states why these are contradictory rather than only mentioning they have opposite information.
Learn more about reliable sources in: brainly.com/question/12203238
Answer: grouped by size of rock fragments
Explanation:
edge 2020
