Answer:
D. the Union honoring tribal treaties signed with the Confederacy
Explanation:
In The tribal treaties, the confederacy promised to not disturbed the Native's land in exchange for their help during the Civil War.
After the civil war ended, the Union decided no to honor these treaties and forced a lot of tribes to migrated out of their ancestral land.
The union wanted to used the land to provide enough space for railroads development. They wanted a fast method of distribution to deliver products from southern states to mid-norther states.
Many runaway Africans from the Deep South found sanctuary with their valuable life.
<h3>What happened to runaway slaves when they were caught?</h3>
in the event that they have been caught, any quantity of horrible matters ought to manifest to them. Many captured fugitive slaves had been flogged, branded, jailed, bought returned to slavery, or maybe killed. now not simplest did fugitive slaves have the fear of starvation and seizure, but there had been also threats supplied through their environment.
<h3>How did they escape the Underground Railroad?</h3>
From elaborate disguises to communicating in code to combating again, enslaved human beings discovered multiple paths to freedom. From intricate disguises to communicating in code to preventing back, enslaved human beings located more than one path to freedom.
Learn more about Deep South here: brainly.com/question/10490681
#SPJ2
Religious persecution, promise of new wealth and more land
Answer:
Explanation:
It all depends on what war you are talking about. America has been in many wars, however; it is debatable about how many were actually on American soil... Many wars were fought in America like the- Revolutionary war, the War of 1812, Civil War, even WWI and WWII were partially fought on our land. All of these wars were won by America because we had more military power and more allies to help us when we needed it, we also had enough factories during those times to provide military weapons to supply our military.
The term historians use when they discuss the relationship between two events in which one is the direct result of another is causation.
Historians may employ the concept of causation in a wide range of ways, each of which is linked with different historiographical claims and different kinds of argumentation.
Through this application, it will be clear that historical narratives are causal, and that micro-history can be seen as a response to a very specific (causal) problem of Braudelian macro-history.
