This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read I Am Very Real, By Kurt Vonnegut, 1973
Which statement best describes how the author uses rhetoric in
paragraphs 4-5 to advance his argument? *
The author presents the contributions he has made to the country in order to prove that he is a real American
The author describes his background in order to explain why coarse language is simply part of how he speaks.
The author portrays himself as a father and a veteran as further proof of his desire to shield the nation's youth from harmful books.
The author explains that he is a man of integrity in order to show why the school's reactions were excessive and wrong.
Answer: The author explains that he is a man of integrity in order to show why the school's reactions were excessive and wrong.
Explanation:
Vonnegut defends his integrity to show that having his book and his entire work deemed as evil was wrong. He presents his actions after the burning of his books, doing "absolutely nothing to exploit the disgusting
news from Drake," as evidence of his integrity. Furthermore, he describes himself as a loving father and an honored veteran to better support his argument.
<em>"Writ of certiorari"</em> is a juridic term. Also known as <em>"cert. </em>(abbreviation) <em>petition</em>" , petition for the writ of certiorari , the right to petition, or to seek judicial review. Can also be translated as <u>"we wish to be informed"</u>.
Certiorari is a contraction of the latin verb <em>"certiorare"</em> , that can be translated as certify ; As writ , from latin <em>"breve" </em>, is an order (documented) emitted by the administrative or judiciary power .
Writ of certiorari is normally the process in which a superior court sends the document requesting of an inferior jurisdiction the records of a particular case to be reviewed. This process depends on the superior court, jurisdiction examining if there are enough elements - reasons- to do so.
Hope it was helpfull
