Abu Bakr was elected after Muhammad's death
Answer:
not permitted to manufacture many finished goods.
Explanation:
Mercantilism is the economic policy that proposed the increase of the wealth of the country by supplying and exporting the finished products to other countries. In this process, the raw materials are processed by the colonies of the countries to help in production of the finished products. These finished projects are then exported to other countries to help in increase the national income. It was because of this reason that the Great Britain did not gave permission to the colonies to not to produce the finished goods.
Inexperienced, mature, imitated and/or sophisticated
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Some historians have argued that the American Revolution was not revolutionary in nature. Instead of fostering revolutionary change, it maintained continuity.
I think that the American Revolution was a genuine revolutionary movement stemmed from the anger and desperation of the American colonists that suffered many grievances from the British government.
The 13 American colonies had to pay heavy taxation such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Acts, the Tea Act. The worst part was that Colonists did not have any voice or representation in the English Parliament.
That is why colonists created secret groups such as the Sons of Liberty and people like Samuel Adams united other colonists against the English crown.
It is true that there were also some particular agendas inside the revolutionary movement, specifically, economic ones. But in essence, for me, it was a true independence movement.
<span>Greeks were in some ways independently -minded and developed a culture of individual freedom where it was considered by many a disgrace to work for someone else. This independence led the lower classes to want to participate in government, and promoted democracy - not today's representative democracy where a member of parliament is supposed to represent the citizens within an electorate, but rather direct democracy, where all the citizens met in assembly each fortnight and made decisions directly on matters put to them by a council, which latter saw to the implementation of their decisions.</span>
