The point is third-person omniscient subjective.
You can tell because the passage states the thoughts/feelings of multiple characters, while not using "I" or "You" or any other first or second person pronouns.
Hope this helped!
A.<span>The author wants to show that he is a superstitious person.</span>
Answer:
The 1930s were not a very hopeful time in the history of world politics, yet here we have Gandhi echoing across the years with a clarion call of hope: do not despair of human nature. People may be obstinate; people may be unkind; people may be downright cruel; but that’s not the whole story. People can change. People can exhibit extraordinary selflessness. People can still love even in the face of the most challenging circumstances, with a fierce, unrelenting love that can stop pipelines and wars. But this love is not a soft, sweet love. It’s the kind of love that resists, and protects, and draws out the highest powers—real power—in people. In a word: nonviolence.
From the context of the sentence, the relationship of the words accurate and authentic is truthfulness and trustworthiness.
<u>Explanation:</u>
To begin with what defines the word "accurate" is the truthfulness of the content which is usually seen in the content analysis. A record of words and text that carries the truth also known as accurate. Whereas, the word "authentic" is record of a record which carries a trustworthiness behind the text but very transparent.
The relationship between accurate and authentic is both truthfulness and trustworthiness. From the context of the sentence, the relationship of the words accurate and authentic is truthfulness and trustworthiness.
The have the same aspects and higher quality of trustworthiness between both the words. The reliability of the record completes the trustworthiness of the authentic.
