Research indicates that driver less cars use information to avoid both minor and major car accidents, making them safer than cars with human drivers.
Answer: Option A.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The paragraph in the question talks about the cars which are without a driver. here driver less cars, according to this paragraph prove to be more impactful and safer than the cars which have a human driver in them.
It is said by a study that driver less cars can collect more data to keep the vehicle safe, which human drivers are unable to do which helps them to avoid the major and the minor impact accidents both. So this proves to be more safe.
Answer:
sub marines are able to success fully navigate under water
Answer:
I would say B. It will be 5-9 sentences.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
<span>Truth is written on all of these levels, except </span>dramatic narrative
