1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
3 years ago
8

What is the term of office for a federal judge

History
2 answers:
8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
6 0
Judges hold their seat until they resign,die, or are removed from office.
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
3 0

In the United States, the title of the federal judge means a judge (pursuant to Article Three of the United States Constitution) appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the United States Senate pursuant to the Appointments Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution.

In addition to the Supreme Court of the United States, whose existence and some aspects of whose jurisdiction are beyond the constitutional power of Congress to alter, Congress has established 13 courts of appeals (also called "circuit courts") with appellate jurisdiction over different regions of the United States, and 94 United States district courts.

Every judge appointed to such a court may be categorized as a federal judge; such positions include the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, Circuit Judges of the courts of appeals, and district judges of the United States district courts. All of these judges described thus far are referred to sometimes as "Article III judges" because they exercise the judicial power vested in the judicial branch of the federal government by Article III of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, judges of the Court of International Trade exercise judicial power pursuant to Article III.

Other judges serving in the federal courts, including magistrate judges and bankruptcy judges, are also sometimes referred to as "federal judges"; however, they are neither appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate, and their power derives from Article I instead. See Article I and Article III tribunals.

You might be interested in
How did the Ku Klux Klan's use of terror interfere with elections in the south?
Alisiya [41]
<span>It prevented/discouraged voting by Blacks and Republicans. 
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What is a government with delegates that represent the interests of constituents called?
Viktor [21]

According to government operations, the government with delegates that represent constituents' interests is called "<u>Representative Democracy</u>."

<h3>What is Representative Democracy?</h3>

A Representative Democracy is a form of government that constitutes the elected individuals such that these elected people represent the group that voted them to make decisions on their behalf.

Representative Democracy is sometimes referred to as indirect democracy because representatives like delegates take decisions.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Representative Democracy."</u>

Learn more about Representative Democracy here: brainly.com/question/393401

7 0
2 years ago
How did Rizal accept his execution? Explain your answer​
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

Rizal stood strong in his beliefs and even refused to sign the notification confirming his execution. Despite his conviction, he eventually agreed to his death sentence and signed it. The judge instructed him to sign the notification of sentence, which is required by law.

Explanation:

yaah

5 0
1 year ago
Give examples that proves that the Civil War played a role in advancing US industrial progress.
mixer [17]

Answer:

An example that proves that the Civil War played a role in advancing U.S. industrial progress is cotton. Cotton was something that gave women a bit of freedom, because they weren't really allowed to go out much instead they stayed home to do housework.

4 0
2 years ago
Which answer best describes an important outcome of the Gibbons v. Ogden court case? The case set definitions for navigation and
Sliva [168]
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did sparta try to prevent change?
    8·1 answer
  • how the virginia slave laws from 1662 to 1669 have made a life like anthony johnsons an impossible one?
    11·1 answer
  • Which countries were invaded by Germany?
    7·2 answers
  • I need help ASAP.Using complete sentences, describe the role of the State Department in handling United States foreign relations
    15·1 answer
  • Which publication was a novel about life under slavery
    12·2 answers
  • What was the cause of world war two in​
    7·2 answers
  • WHAT EFFECT DID THE SEAS HAVE ON THE GREEKS? HOW DID IT IMPACT THE WAY THEY LIVED?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a disadvantage listed on the page?
    9·1 answer
  • In a kinetic model explain why a metal rod expands when heated​
    9·1 answer
  • What did Peter learn during his travels to Western Europe?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!