The Salt March on March 12, 1930 A demonstrator offers a flower to military police at a National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam-sponsored protest in Arlington, Virginia, on October 21, 1967 A "No NATO" protester in Chicago, 2012Nonviolent resistance (NVR or nonviolent action) is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, while being nonviolent. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms—nonviolent resistance and civil resistance—has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments. Major nonviolent resistance advocates include Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau, Te Whiti o Rongomai, Tohu Kākahi, Leo Tolstoy, Alice Paul, Martin Luther King, Jr, James Bevel, Václav Havel, Andrei Sakharov, Lech Wałęsa, Gene Sharp, and many others. There are hundreds of books and papers on the subject—see Further reading below. From 1966 to 1999, nonviolent civic resistance played a critical role in fifty of sixty-seven transitions from authoritarianism.[1] Recently, nonviolent resistance has led to the Rose Revolution in Georgia and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Current nonviolent resistance includes the Jeans Revolution in Belarus, the "Jasmine" Revolution in Tunisia, and the fight of the Cuban dissidents. Many movements which promote philosophies of nonviolence or pacifism have pragmatically adopted the methods of nonviolent action as an effective way to achieve social or political goals. They employ nonviolent resistance tactics such as: information warfare, picketing, marches, vigils, leafletting, samizdat, magnitizdat, satyagraha, protest art, protest music and poetry, community education and consciousness raising, lobbying, tax resistance, civil disobedience, boycotts or sanctions, legal/diplomatic wrestling, underground railroads, principled refusal of awards/honors, and general strikes. Nonviolent action differs from pacifism by potentially being proactive and interventionist. A great deal of work has addressed the factors that lead to violent mobilization, but less attention has been paid to understanding why disputes become violent or nonviolent, comparing these two as strategic choices relative to conventional politics.[2] Contents 1 History of nonviolent resistance2 See also2.1 Documentaries2.2 Organizations and people
American troops would leave within one year and American POWs in North Vietnam would be freed. are best explanation of the two conditions agreed upon to bring an end to the Vietnam War.
Explanation:
On Jan. 23, 1973, President Richard Nixon proclaimed an accord had been moved to end the Vietnam War. In a televised speech, Nixon said the agreement would “end the war and bring peace with honor.” North Vietnam forces pushed south, and by the spring of 1975 were nearing the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon.Finishing the Vietnam War, 1969–1973. President Richard M. Nixon appropriated duty for the Vietnam War as he affirmed the oath of office on January 20, 1969. He acknowledged that ending this war justly was essential to his success in the chairmanship.
This period made available the use of fertilizers, high yield grains we planted, and the use of irrigation.
INTENDED OUTCOMES: high yield seeds are being used, reduce starvation with massive food production, use of pesticide and chemical fertilizers.
UNINTENDED OUTCOMES: were the damages to small farmers by widening the gap between them and those with bigger farm, soil depletion, and chemical runoff.
Explanation:
Green Revolution also known as the third agricultural revolution was a form research capability using technology during the late 1950s and 1960s which resulted or bring high agricultural produce through out the world.
The Green Revolution brings about the use of high yielding seeds with chemical fertilizers for greater food production.
INTENDED OUTCOMES: these include high yield production, increase food production, save millions over the world of starvation, increase use of technology to ease food production and the use of pesticide to protect food crops damage.
UNINTENDED OUTCOMES: these are resulted into creating wide margin between small farmers and the those farmers who owns the land, soil and water resources being depleted
1) Women had many rights but were unable to practice law or medicine. 2) Female physicians could only be trained by women and could only treat women. 3) Any woman who could read or write would be able to be trained as a physician
I think it's B. New taxes placed on the clergy. Both individuals didn't want the other controlling them. But Philip IV of France taxed the clergy anyways?
