I believe your asking about the ionosphere
Answer:
The effects would be pretty negative.
Explanation:
Because as population increase, there would be an increase of demands or needs. As a result, resources would decrease such as wood, freshwater, animals (since some animals have already gone extinct). As for the environment, yes there would be some people trying to change the environment but people with big money, own big companies and because of that, there would be a problem. These big companies don't really care about the environment only the cash itself. So, they would pollute the water, and due to the dirty water, aqua animals will die. In addition, when the population increase, people would litter, I know that there are laws in it, but there's still trash on the ocean and the ground. Therefore, population can effect the resource and environment by increase the demands of needs and the environment slowly diminishing.
Also, if the population decrease, the effect will still be negative towards the environment but there would be a hope for change or action for change. The resources might increase because we won't need to cut down many trees, overfish or overhunt, and etc.
The answer to the given question is explained as follows:
It discusses the disadvantages of a local economy whose diversity plays a vital role in private sector.
Local economy is diversified by shifting it from single income source to various income sources.
The disadvantages include,
bad investment vehicles
Reduces quality
Market risks
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24369548
Answer:
B. The warm climate allowed the ancient Greeks to farm all year long.
Explanation:
The warm climate of Greece helped Ancient Greece farm all year long. However, Greece also has a mountainous, rocky terrain, and some areas of the territory are semi-desertic, which meant that the Ancient Greeks could only farm in some areas of Greece.