Answer:
The contrast in GDP per capital growth relative to productivity growth between the two countries and the effect of compounding decrease
Explanation:
Solution
The GDP growth rate relative productive growth was one of the prime factors of total growth during the late 20th century.
The more technological investment, the higher was the productivity together with compounding could have played a vital role.
By compounding it refers to the reinvestment with the aid of established generated revenue. this implies that capital is used to its fullest thus increasing productivity. thus maybe the country with Low GDP per capital might have experienced a decrease, then compounding further abetting a downturn in the GDP growth rate.
Answer:
a. 8.33 percent
Explanation:
The computation of the economy's growth rate between the two years is presented below:
= (GDP at the end of year 2 - GDP at the end of year 1) ÷ (GDP at the end of year 1) × 100
= ($1,300 billion - $1,200 billion) ÷ ($1,200 billion) × 100
= ($100 billion) ÷ ($1,200 billion) × 100
= 8.33%
The economic growth rate is always expressed in percentage form
Answer:
You can find your answer in attached document.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is a. has no incentive to hold costs down.
Explanation:
Given that in the natural monopoly there is no competition for the characteristic that we have as a company to offer our products at a lower price and with highly competitive quality, then the direct question of pricing will not have really in-depth studies that take into account the competitors' behavior in order to establish direct incentives. Its fixing method is basic and strictly depends on internal issues such as the expected profitability margin, supply, demand and production process.
