The prince's assignment seems to be a secondary source of heritage mostly on a basis including its description provided in the previous section.
What was the secondary source?
- Using a synthesis of primary sources, academic journal articles, and other secondary sources, secondary source books are written by scholars and present a fresh interpretation or thesis.
- Sometimes you'll need to piece together information from numerous monographs, and other times you'll find a full book.
- Secondary sources typically include a bibliography with resources for further research.
- Due to the fact that even the Chinese prince wrote some documents many years after the events they purport to represent, they fall under the category of secondary sources and are thus not primary.
- Useful techniques, including both primary and secondary sources of information, for learning about historical occurrences that take place in a single location.
To know more about Secondary source visit :
brainly.com/question/17751886
#SPJ9
I would say the answer is the 335 Years War.
I believe the correct answer is D
Many people reacted in a good way to the new constitution, while some thought it gave too much power to the government. The Federalists supported the new constitution in 1787, while the Anti-Federalists primarily did not agree with it.
The Federalists were in support of a new constitution. They believed that the Articles of Confederation, which was the United States' first constitution, was too weak and the government needed more power. Under the Articles, the government could not tax citizens, properly create and enforce laws, regulate trade, and draft soldiers. The Federalists felt like this was weakening the country and they needed to amend it. While the Articles ended up getting scrapped altogether, the Federalists were in support of this and wanted to create a new constitution that gave more power to the federal government.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists favored the Articles of Confederation and did not want to amend it or create a new constitution. They associated the government having power with British tyranny and thought the power should be in the hands of the states and citizens. They opposed having a new constitution and were scared for their rights, this is why they demanded to have a Bill of Rights.
