What the difference that the rich romans and poor romans religion

History

1 answer:

vekshin14 years ago

7 0

Explanation:

All the wealthy and all the non-wealthy romans all believed that religion was one of most important thing in their life. Although they had different wealth, they had somewhat the same opinions. ... Poor Roman: Mainly ate vegetables grown in their own gardens because they were not wealthy enough to afford any types of meat.

You might be interested in

What role did Nevada play in the War?

Vikentia [17]

Answer:

Nevada's contribution to the civil war was the Comstock Lode, whose silver totaling $400 million financed the Union war effort to defeat the Confederacy

Explanation:

Give me Brainllest

6 0

3 years ago

Why would a true Socialist economy not work in the United States?

Firdavs [7]

A socialist economy wouldn't work because America was built off of capitalism and like it or not, business feeds a majority of America's economy. Without our strong ties in international business, we would lose monetary relationships throughout the world and our economy would sink.

6 0

3 years ago

What if France won the French and Indian war? How might this have affected the 13 colonies?

Hoochie [10]

Answer:

If the French would of won, it would be easier for the Native Americans because the French were more understanding of the Indians and they were more willing to negotiate with them. The French would of taken control of the colonies and our country as it is today would be completely different. We might be speaking French instead of English. Maybe the colonies wouldn't of rebelled and we would still be under French rule

4 0

4 years ago

What was the result of the court case brown vs. board of education

Bumek [7]

Answer:

It ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did William McNeill's "The Rise of the West after Twenty-Five Years" article reveal about his

devlian [24]

Answer:

For inasmuch as all North America was the West vis-&vis the Old World that colonists and later immigrants had left behind, the West was considered a “more perfect” place conducive, not to danger and lawlessness, but to liberty, equality, and prosperity.McNeill's "The Rise of the West after Twenty-Five Years" article reveal about understand global history on the basis of cultural diffusion devel.For inasmuch as all North America was the West vis-&vis the Old World that colonists and later immigrants had left behind, the West was considered a “more perfect” place conducive, not to danger and lawlessness, but to liberty, equality, and prosperity.

8 0

3 years ago