Dawn was just breaking.
I had just woken up and quickly prepared my gear for today’s
lesson. I do so quickly so as not to
earn the ire of my teachers. I polish my
armor and my shield and see to it my sword and spear are clean and sharp. Class will start in an hour and it will be
about shield and spear drills. I mentally
steady for the demands of the lesson and hope I do my best so that one I will
be warrior worthy to defend Sparta.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
Plessy appealed to the court claiming 13th and 14th amendment were violated
13th forbids slavery
14th prohibits any person within its area of control the equal protection law
Plessys appeal was violation of thirteenth and fourteenth amendment
<span>Reading about how earlier historians wrote about the French Revolution</span>
The answer is Reaganomics.
To solve the economic problems, he proposed a free market approach with
across the board tax cuts. He believed
that this would stimulate business and expand the tax base to cover for revenue
loss. This resulted in the decrease of inflation
and more jobs being offered to the people.
