Answer:
$2,189.76
Explanation:
<em>The price of a bond is the present value (PV) of the future cash inflows expected from the bond discounted using the yield to maturity.</em>
<em>The price of the bond can be calculated as follows:</em>
<em>Step 1</em>
<em>PV of interest payment</em>
Interest payment =( 5.94%× $2000)/2
= $59.4
Semi annual yield = 5.1/2 = 2.6%
PV of interest payment
= 59.4× (1-(1.026)^(-20×2))/0.026)
= 59.4 × 24.41400537
=<em>$ 1,450.19</em>
Step 2
<em>PV of redemption value</em>
= 2,000 × (1+0.051)^(-20)
= 2,000 × 0.369781925
= 739.56
Step 3
<em>Price of bond </em>
= $1,450.19 + $739.56
=$2,189.76
Answer:
The correct answer is b. Adjusting revenues to only include organic revenue growth.
Explanation:
One of the quantitative planning techniques is the projection of financial statements or also called pro forma statements.
The applications that can be had among others are the following:
Know how the year will end for tax purposes in terms of income and deductions in order to make decisions before the end of the year.
Another application will be to know the external financing needs for the period you want to know.
The most common and practical method of projecting financial statements is based on sales.
Answer:
The specified preferences of Charles, Diana and Juanita. Charles and Juniata prefer chocolate over red velvet cake. Dina favors red velvet over chocolate.
So, when there is voting among red velvet and chocolate cake, the majority will select the Chocolate cake and among winner and vanilla majority will vote for Vanilla cake.
This is because Dina and Juanita favor vanilla over chocolate.
Among Chocolate and vanilla cake, the majority will elect for vanilla and among this winner and red velvet cake, the majority will choose for Red velvet cake.
This is because Diana and juanita favor vanilla over chocolate. So, vanilla cakes get majority elects. When there is voting among vanilla and red velvet , red vanilla acquire majority votes as charles and dina favor red velvet over vanilla.
The statement is False. The preferences are not transitive.
In the first situation chocolate is chosen to vanilla and red velvet is preferred to vanilla. Although, in the second situation, chocolate is favored to red velvet and vanilla is preferred to chocolate. Thus, the preferences do not exhibit transitivity.
Answer:
C) III
- III. No, the policy was excluded from Joseph's estate.
Explanation:
It doesn't matter who pays the policy's premiums, what matters is who is the beneficiary of the policy. If the proceeds of the policy are paid to the insured's estate, then they are part of it, but if the proceeds are paid to another beneficiary, then they are not included in the estate.
Since Joseph's wife was the owner and beneficiary of the policy, the proceeds will be paid directly to her. The advantage here is that proceeds from the life insurance policy are not taxed as income, but if Joseph's state was larger than $5.43 million, then estate taxes might apply.