All categories

4 years ago

3 - 2n = 7 Show work please

2 answers:

4 0

Answer & Explanation-

1. 3-2n=7

2. Subtract 3 from both sides to make x alone.

3. -2n=4

4. Divide both sides by -2

5. n=-2

Answer-

n=-2

vlada-n [284]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

3-2n=7

-3 -3

-2n=4

divide both sides by -2

n=-2

You might be interested in

What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (3,8) and (8,13) write the answer in simplest form

qwelly [4]

Answer: y=5

X=5

5/5 or 1

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

I HONESTLY NEED HELP!!

Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

an additional hour of walking is associated with an additional 0.7 mile walk

7 0

3 years ago

The ages of three family children can be expressed as consecutive integers. the square of the age of the youngest child is 4 mor

sukhopar [10]

Let the middle child be x
youngest child = x - 1
Oldest child = x + 1

(x - 1)^2 = 8(x + 1) + 4
x^2 - 2x + 1 = 8x + 8 + 4
x^2 - 10x - 11 = 0
(x - 11) * (x + 1) = 0

X = - 1 makes no sense. How can a middle child be - 1 years old?
x = 11

The youngest child is 10
The middle child is 11
The oldest child is 12

Check
=====
10^2 = 100
(8*12) + 4
96 + 4 = 100 So the results have been checked.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the slope of the line through (-4,2) and (3, 3)? "/ yo Choose 1 answer: 19 21 42 142 A А 7 5 B 7 5 5 7 5 7 e slope an

NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

1/7

Step-by-step explanation:

m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m=(3-2)/(3-(-4))

m=1/(3+4)

m=1/7

5 0

3 years ago

A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

$p_2$ = proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards.

SO, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1 \geq p_2$ {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1 < p_2$ {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z-test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{200}{1000}$ = 0.20

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = $\frac{168}{800}$ = 0.21

$n_1$ = sample of Republicans = 1000

$n_2$ = sample of Democrats = 800

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.20-0.21)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{1000}+\frac{0.21(1-0.21)}{800} } }$

= -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula;

P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z $\leq$ 0.52)

= 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

7 0

3 years ago