I think it would be right to peacefully assemble because we mostly know the first amendment is right to speech, religion, etc., but with the right to speech you could peacefully "speak" your opinion.
To offer medical assistance to Third World countries.
The imperialism movement of the 19th century did not show particular concern for the native peoples in the regions they came to control through imperialistic means. There were medical missions and religious missions that accompanied the imperialistic advance into other countries, but those were factors that accompanied the imperialistic advance more than they motivated it.
Also, as a false component of that option, the term "Third World" didn't come into existence until the era of the Cold War. The "Third World" referred to the developing nations that did not align with either of the superpowers, the USA or the USSR. No one was using the term "Third World" in the 19th century.
Yes, moderate republicans wanted the reconstruction plan while radical republicans thought reconstruction was too lenient toward the south and wasn’t harsh enough due to the fact they caused the war. The radical republicans plan was to disband the aristocracy with farming, redistribute land and guarantee the civil rights to former slaves.
Answer:
David R. Montgomery (first)
<span>congress must establish a concrete connection betweeb a law's provision and interstate commerce before superseding policies that traditionally fall under state jurisdiction</span>
