How did the government leaders in Egypt and Tunisia lose their positions?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Marina CMI [18]3 years ago

5 0

C. They were overthrown by the military.

Explanation:

Northern Africa has not been in the best of conditions in the past decade or so. Pretty much all countries in the region had big problems of one sort or another. Egypt and Tunisia experienced coups with the assistance of the military forces, Algeria had internal unrest and protests, Libya had a war and expansion of terrorism, while Morocco lost part of its territory which declared itself as independent.

When it comes to Egypt and Tunisia, there were large scale protests by the majority of the populations in these two countries. The people were not satisfied by their governments and their policies and they made it clear that they want them down. This was used by military generals which took the military under their command and using force stripped the government officials from their power and took it for themselves. Instead of making the things better, the military generals started and still do exhibit dictatorship policies, and this leads to continuous unrest.

You might be interested in

Population density is the number of people that live in a region divided by the number of blank

zmey [24]

Population density is the number of people that live in a region, divided by a specific measurement such as square miles or square kilometers.

I hope this helps!

Have a nice day!

:)

4 0

3 years ago

An object or action that means more than its literal meaning

12345 [234]

<span>An object or action that means more than its literal meaning is known as "symbol".
We can define symbol in many ways as it is a check, sign, or word that demonstrates, means, or is comprehended as speaking to a thought, question, or relationship or a thing that speaks to or remains for something different, particularly a material protest speaking to something extract. Symbols enable individuals to go past what is known or seen by making linkages between generally altogether different ideas and experiences.
</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Native Americans were promised new lands in the west where they would be protected from land-hungry homesteaders. This is an exa

Ann [662]

Answer

Pull factor in migration

Explanation

A pull factor best describes things that attracts people to a country, a religion ,an organization, a region e.t.c Native Americans who were the people who discovered and lived in the America very many years ago. They were promised new lands in the west where they would be protected from land-hungry homesteaders which in migration is considered as a pull factor in migration .Migration is a global phenomenon which is caused by economic and social political, cultural, environmental, health, education and transportation factors. Pull factors in migration are the positive aspects that attract immigrants .They include better education and job prospects,political stability and religious freedom.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who does nathan radley blame for trespassing on his property? what does the response of his neighbors suggest about racial tensi

Ede4ka [16]

In Chapter 6 of "To Kill a Mocking Bird" by Harper Lee, Nathan Radley blames a black man for trespassing on his property on a summer night. He is quick to accuse the black man of doing such action, when in fact it was Jem Finch who committed the act of trespassing.

This situation shows how when a crime is committed in Maycomb county, the whole community will be quick to believe the worst of black people, but will not actually stop to asses the situation with caution and justice. In the book, the situation is turned into a joke, when Miss Stephanie declares that the shot "scared him pale". Nobody is taking the situation as a serious one because they all assume that what Nathan Radley is saying is true, because the accused is a black person.

3 0

3 years ago

Although children of authoritarian caregivers tend to be productive in school, they seem to have fewer social skills than other

Sati [7]

Although children of authoritarian caregivers tend to be productive in school, they seem to have fewer social skills than other children. True

Explanation:

Although children of authoritarian caregivers tend to be productive in school because of the strict discipline they grow up in and the way the school rewards discipline and the willingness to study over other scholastic achievements specially in early curriculum.

More often than not students who are forced to study more tend to do better initially in studies but they have a severe lack in social skills compared to other children

4 0

3 years ago