Sullas seizure of Rome in 82 B.C. was partly the legacy of a new military recruitment system. Lucius Cornelius Sullas was given command of the war in Asia Minor. The Roman council attempted to then give leadership of the war to Marcus, this then resulted in a civil war. Lucius Sullas won and seized Rome.
They did not see the native Americans as citizens who could own land. And settlers wanted control over their land because they saw that native Americans had better resources.
Hey there!
These are the emperors that I found:
Julio-Claudian Emperors
<span>Tiberius -- great military leader, kept economy stable </span>
<span>Caligula -- abolished sales tax, crazy </span>
Claudius -- built new harbor, aqueduct, conquered Britain
Nero -- constructed new buildings, gives slaves right to file complaints
<span>After Nero committed suicide,
</span>
There are probably more!
This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
