Which best states how a section of the Missouri Compromise supported Dred Scott's argument?

History

2 answers:

AnnyKZ [126]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

is this a response question?

Explanation:

dlinn [17]3 years ago

4 0

<h3><em>Answer: The Missouri Compromise declared that an enslaved person gained his or her freedom upon entering a free state. In the famous Dred Scott Supreme Court case, Dred Scott was a slave who was brought into a free territory by his owner. After living there for an extended period of time and after his master passed away, Scott sued for his freedom. His argument relied on the fact that he was in a free territory and that this legally made him a free man. However, the Supreme Court justices ruled that slaves are not people. Rather, they are property and have no right to sue in court. This ruling essentially made slavery legal everywhere, delivering a huge blow to the abolitionist movement of the time.</em></h3><h3><em>I hope this helps love <3 (:</em></h3>

<em />

You might be interested in

Why did Thomas Paine question British authonty to rule the colonies in Common Sense?

frozen [14]

Answer:

bcuz then they would reallyy mess up

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

In the 1840s, the United States had a dispute over the Oregon Country with

Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

Spain

Explanation:

The Oregon boundary dispute or the Oregon Question was a 19th-century territorial dispute over the political division of the Pacific Northwest of North America

7 0

3 years ago

What are three aspects of the Treaty Versailles that could be considered "unfair" to Germany?

Makovka662 [10]

1. Full disarming. Germany basically agreed to have no standing army whatsoever.

2. Germany lost over half of it's territory in the treaty.

3. Germany had to pay A LOT of money in damages + interest.

5 0

3 years ago

About social classes and The Crusades.

olga nikolaevna [1]

Your answer is simply,

Bourgeoise.

8 0

3 years ago

The Emancipation Proclamation could be considered a turning point in the Civil War because it:

V125BC [204]

Answer

Provideed a moral reason to fight the war

Explanation:

Abraham Lincoln states explicitly, "all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free". He only freed the slaves in the confederate states of America, and formally tied the issue of slavery directly with the war.

5 0

3 years ago