<h3>The Holocaust (Ha-shoah in Hebrew) took place between 1933 and 1945 and is associated with the persecution and murder of over 6,000,000 Jews and other people, including gays and Roma people. During the Holocaust, two thirds of all Jews in Europe were killed and one third of the world’s Jewish population, but when did it all start? Anti-Semitism in Germany existed for quite some time before the Nazi rule and the ethnic cleansing plan that they called the “Final Solution” developed gradually, making it hard to tie a set date to the start of the Holocaust. Most historians however agree that the 30th January 1933 when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany, was the main turning point that set everything in motion, marking this date as the start of the Holocaust.</h3>
mark BRAINLIEST plzzzz
<span>Criminality can be a response to the rules of the governing body. For example, thieves may be responding to taxation or lack of employment. However, psychologists may refute this idea. There are genetic factors that interplay with environmental factors that then result in criminal behavior. Murderers, for instance, may have a different brain structure that impacts their perception of human life. Even if one believed the state failed in terms of justice, not all people would turn to murder in response. Only those with certain biological factors and experiences might take a person's life.</span>
The main purpose of taxes is to generate revenue for funding government programs.
Answer: Justice Department.
Explanation:
The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice develops, implements, and oversees the enforcement of federal criminal laws through its 93 attorneys commanded with criminal matters and some civil litigation. They also assist the Attorney General of the United States, the United States Congress, and the White House.
The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
