[I]t is impossible for the collectivity to undertake the direct settlement of all the controversies that may arise.
Answer: Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The claim that has been given in this option has been supported by an example that has been given by the author in the final paragraph. The evidence is given of the time when Peter wrongs Paul in the passage.
The example given shows and demonstrates why is it weird and absurd to imagine that the entire collectivity would be able to examine the circumstances of the controversy and to adjudicate it and to make a formal judgement and the decision about a matter which is disputed.
<span>B.Consider factors :))
</span>
Answer:
One day in the summer, my friends and I were hanging out. All of a sudden, we were hungry, so we walked in the sunny sun to the store. We talked on the way there, laughing at most. In the store, we bought snacks and drinks. They tasted fine. I mean, it was a snack, not the main meal. After eating, we were tired and bored, so we headed back home. At home, I took a nap. It was very relaxing.
Explanation:
One day in the summer, my friends and I were hanging out. All of a sudden, we were hungry, so we walked in the sunny sun (describe the sun, sunlight) to the store. We talked on the way there, laughing at most (or whatever you did to get there and what you did on the way). In the store, we bought snacks and drinks. They tasted fine. I mean, it was a snack, not the main meal (how did it taste and what did you think of it?). After eating, we were tired and bored (your feelings at that moment), so we headed back home. At home, I took a nap. It was very relaxing (or what you did after that).
The play hinges on the paradoxes you mention because throughout the play, appearances are deceptive which is what "fair is foul. foul is fair" means, i.e., what looks fair is foul and what looks foul is fair. Lady Macbeth tells her husband in Act 1, sc. 5, to put on a false expression to keep people from knowing what he's up to. At the end of the act, in sc. 7, Macbeth himself says the same thing. After the killing of Duncan in Act 2, both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth pretend innocense. In Act 2, sc. 3, Donalbain acknowledges the fact that people are being deceptive - "...there's daggers in men's smiles." The witches take advantage of Macbeth's paranoia and need for security by giving him a false sense of security with their apparitions. The second and third visions make Macbeth feel invulnerable to attack, but it's all a trick. Even as Malcolm and the others move toward Dunsinane, they are covering their actions with the limbs they've cut down from Birnam woods giving the appearance of moving trees rather than of moving men. In the end, the battle is "lost" by Macbeth and by Scotland in that Duncan is dead, but it is "won" because Macbeth is dead and Malcolm is now king.