Answer:
The elements of the above excerpt from the story that would appeal to children are the animal character and the dialogue.
Explanation:
Children are drawn to animals and animal images because of their cuteness and lack of danger. Younger children may sympathize with animal characters more easily than human beings. It appeals to animal-loving kids. As a result, interactions become simpler to comprehend and accept. Animals can make children smart, loving, and empathetic. Animals help youngsters overcome their helplessness. Young children view animals as "human-like" and do not consider them "other." It is also fascinating to youngsters to hear stories about talking animals and the dialog between the traveler and the dog. Stories like these also demonstrate how connections work and how to accept one another's differences. They expose kids to circumstances that are beyond their comfort zone, especially difficult emotions. Animal stories provide a unique and pleasant setting for youngsters to learn tough concepts.
The moral lesson could actually be also appealing to children, maybe when they are in a classroom set up where there is a teacher that will guide them to figure out the moral of the story. However, if they are reading on their own, I think it would be hard especially for very young ones to figure the moral lesson themselves.
And yes, the humor in the above excerpt can also be appealing to children, especially when the dog responds to his master. For English-speaking children, it is easier to see the humor in it. However, for young English as Second Language learners, it may be difficult to understand it. But generally speaking the humor in the story makes it appealing to children since it offers fun and amusing features.
Answer:
Packing is a story about three friends who are getting ready to go for a journey. Thus, Packing summary will help students understand this story in a simplified form. It follows the packing session of three friends, Jerome, Harris, and George.
Answer and Explanation:
Doane Hoag and Jules Dassin were very faithful to Poe's narrative and presented the work as Poe wrote, but with visual and auditory effects that may have changed the meaning of the work for other people. I don't particularly believe that they added new meanings, but they intensified those reported by Poe. That's because the soundtrack, the play of light and shadow, the expression of the actors show the madness, the insanity, the cruelty, the torture and the folly of the story. In the film, the meaning of these things gets much stronger, because we can see Poe's words come to life and leave the role becoming something real. This was masterfully done by Doane Hoag and Jules Dassin.
A three line stanza is known as a<span> tercet.</span>
1. I can measure what I eat.
2. I can measure specific foods, meals, etc.
3. An attainable plan would include: Grocery shopping for foods that are healthy and eating them. An unattainable plan would include: Spending thousands on food I won’t eat.
4. A relevant plan would include: Working out, calorie deficits, eating healthy, etc. An irrelevant plan would include: Eating junk food and playing video games.
5. A time frame for the plan is: Achieve a healthy lifestyle within 6 months- 1 year.
