Answer: Objective criteria. The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
By using objective criteria, this helps to ensure the best way that the negotiation will proceed along the lines of the discussion. Mangers will use negotiation to influence his productivity in his/her department. They will be able to avoid excessive interface by negotiating for more money and time.
Objective criteria is when real and factual information is used at work, with police, or even during a loan process. This is most often used when a third party is involved in the negotiation process. The third party will know the relevant information related to negotiation and will be able to give clear and precise information to all parties involved.
Answer:
- Division A - $173,710
- Division B - $239,600
Explanation:
First determine the fringe benefits per employee for the whole company;
= 413,310 / 69
= $5,990 per employee
Division A has 29 employees so the fringe benefit cost is;
= 29 * 5,990
= $173,710
Division B has 40 employees so the fringe benefit cost is;
= 40 * 5,990
= $239,600
The correct options for the matchup are:
For Investing mistake :
For Good investment decision:
<h3>What is known as an investment?</h3>
An investment is known to be a kind of an asset or item that is gotten by a person with the aim of getting income or appreciation.
Note that Appreciation is said to be an increase in the value of an asset in course of time and from the above, you can see those who made good decision and those who made bad decision.
Learn more about investment from
brainly.com/question/25300925
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. the study of strategy and strategic behavior.
Explanation:
Game theory is the study of strategy and strategic behavior. It is assumed that the parties involved are rational. The payoff of a player of a game is determined by the actions of others in the game.
A popular example of game theory is the prisoners dilemma.
A game theory can involve more than two players.
An example of prisoners dilemma:
There are two prisoners - if both confess to a crime, they both get 5 years in prison. If both prisoners don't confess they are set free. If one confess and the other doesn't, the prisoner that confesses 2 years in prison while the other prisoner that didn't confess gets 10 years in prison.
The dominant strategy which is the best option for the prisoner regardless of what the other prisoner does is to confess.
The Nash equilibrium is for both prisoners to defect.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The quadrilateral is drawn above
