<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer: The answer is y=-3x
Step-by-step explanation: You can see in the picture that the line is going down which represents a negative slope so you can eliminate C and D. Now you are left with A and B. 1 unit up is equal to 3 so the rise over run is -3/1 and that translates to Y=-3x answer B
What exactly is your question?
Answer:
∠1 ≅ ∠2 ⇒ proved down
Step-by-step explanation:
#12
In the given figure
∵ LJ // WK
∵ LP is a transversal
∵ ∠1 and ∠KWP are corresponding angles
∵ The corresponding angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠1 = m∠KWP
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠KWP ⇒ (1)
∵ WK // AP
∵ WP is a transversal
∵ ∠KWP and ∠WPA are interior alternate angles
∵ The interior alternate angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠KWP = m∠WPA
∴ ∠KWP ≅ ∠WPA ⇒ (2)
→ From (1) and (2)
∵ ∠1 and ∠WPA are congruent to ∠KWP
∴ ∠1 and ∠WPA are congruent
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠WPA ⇒ (3)
∵ WP // AG
∵ AP is a transversal
∵ ∠WPA and ∠2 are interior alternate angles
∵ The interior alternate angles are equal in measures
∴ m∠WPA = m∠2
∴ ∠WPA ≅ ∠2 ⇒ (4)
→ From (3) and (4)
∵ ∠1 and ∠2 are congruent to ∠WPA
∴ ∠1 and ∠2 are congruent
∴ ∠1 ≅ ∠2 ⇒ proved
2x - 3y = - 2
3x - 2y = 12
the value of X in the solution to the system is 4.